• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • A) Publicaciones Científicas UCSC
    • Facultad de Educación
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • A) Publicaciones Científicas UCSC
    • Facultad de Educación
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reliability and validity of different methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    García, Amador -Reliability and validity.pdf (1.889Mb)
    Date
    2019-10
    Author
    García Ramos, Amador
    Barboza González, Paola
    Ulloa Díaz, David
    Rodriguez Perea, Angela
    Martinez Garcia, Darío
    Guede Rojas, Francisco
    Hinojosa Riveros, Hans
    Chirosa Ríos, Luis Javier
    Cuevas Aburto, Jesualdo
    Janicijevic, Danica
    Weakley, Jonathon
    Publisher
    Journal of Sports Sciences
    Description
    Artículo de publicación SCOPUS
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study examined the reliability and validity of three methods of estimating the one-repetition maximum (1RM) during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise. Twenty-six men (22 rowers and four weightlifters) performed an incremental loading test until reaching their 1RM, followed by a set of repetitions-to-failure. Eighteen participants were re-tested to conduct the reliability analysis. The 1RM was estimated through the lifts-to-failure equations proposed by Lombardi and O'Connor, general load-velocity (L-V) relationships proposed by Sánchez-Medina and Loturco and the individual L-V relationships modelled using four (multiple-point method) or only two loads (two-point method). The direct method provided the highest reliability (coefficient of variation [CV] = 2.45% and intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.97), followed by the Lombardi's equation (CV = 3.44% and ICC = 0.94), and no meaningful differences were observed between the remaining methods (CV range = 4.95-6.89% and ICC range = 0.81-0.91). The lifts-to-failure equations overestimated the 1RM (3.43-4.08%), the general L-V relationship proposed by Sánchez-Medina underestimated the 1RM (-3.77%), and no significant differences were observed for the remaining prediction methods (-0.40-0.86%). The individual L-V relationship could be recommended as the most accurate method for predicting the 1RM during the free-weight prone bench pull exercise.
    URI
    http://repositoriodigital.ucsc.cl/handle/25022009/2052
    Ir a texto completo en URI:
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2019.1626071
    Collections
    • Facultad de Educación

    UCSC
    UCSC | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    UCSC
    UCSC | Contact Us | Send Feedback