• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • A) Publicaciones Científicas UCSC
    • Facultad de Educación
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • A) Publicaciones Científicas UCSC
    • Facultad de Educación
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Pérez, Piepoli, Delgado, Garrido, García (Reliability and concurrent...).pdf (151.8Kb)
    Date
    2019-05
    Author
    Pérez-Castilla, Alejandro
    Piepoli, Antonio
    Delgado-García, Gabriel
    Garrido-Blanca, Gabriel
    García-Ramos, Amador
    Publisher
    Wolters Kluwer
    Description
    Artículo de publicación ISI
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Pérez-Castilla, A, Piepoli, A, Delgado-García, G, Garrido-Blanca, G, and García-Ramos, A. Reliability and concurrent validity of seven commercially available devices for the assessment of movement velocity at different intensities during the bench press. J Strength Cond Res 33(5): 1258–1265, 2019—The aim of this study was to compare the reliability and validity of 7 commercially available devices to measure movement velocity during the bench press exercise. Fourteen men completed 2 testing sessions. One-repetition maximum (1RM) in the bench press exercise was determined in the first session. The second testing session consisted of performing 3 repetitions against 5 loads (45, 55, 65, 75, and 85% of 1RM). The mean velocity was simultaneously measured using an optical motion sensing system (Trio-OptiTrack; “gold-standard”) and 7 commercially available devices: 1 linear velocity transducer (T-Force), 2 linear position transducers (Chronojump and Speed4Lift), 1 camera-based optoelectronic system (Velowin), 1 smartphone application (PowerLift), and 2 inertial measurement units (IMUs) (PUSH band and Beast sensor). The devices were ranked from the most to the least reliable as follows: (a) Speed4Lift (coefficient of variation [CV] = 2.61%); (b) Velowin (CV = 3.99%), PowerLift (3.97%), Trio-OptiTrack (CV = 4.04%), T-Force (CV = 4.35%), and Chronojump (CV = 4.53%); (c) PUSH band (CV = 9.34%); and (d) Beast sensor (CV = 35.0%). A practically perfect association between the Trio-OptiTrack system and the different devices was observed (Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient (r) range = 0.947–0.995; p < 0.001) with the only exception of the Beast sensor (r = 0.765; p < 0.001). These results suggest that linear velocity/position transducers, camera-based optoelectronic systems, and the smartphone application could be used to obtain accurate velocity measurements for restricted linear movements, whereas the IMUs used in this study were less reliable and valid.
    URI
    http://repositoriodigital.ucsc.cl/handle/25022009/2063
    Ir a texto completo en URI:
    https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003118
    Collections
    • Facultad de Educación

    UCSC
    UCSC | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    UCSC
    UCSC | Contact Us | Send Feedback