• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • A) Producción científica UCSC
    • Artículos Científicos
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • A) Producción científica UCSC
    • Artículos Científicos
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of resistance-training programs differing in set configuration on maximal strength and explosive-action performance

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Effect of Resistance-Training Programs Differing in Set Configuration on Maximal Strength and Explosive-Action Performance.pdf (551.5Kb)
    Date
    2021
    Author
    Cuevas Aburto, Jesualdo Daniel
    Jukic, Ivan
    González Hernández, Jorge Miguel
    Janicijevic, Danika
    Barboza González, Paola
    Chirosa Ríos, Luis Javier
    García Ramos, Amador
    Publisher
    Human Kinetics
    Description
    Artículo de publicación ISI
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Purpose: To compare the effects of 2 upper-body strength-training programs differing in set configuration on bench press 1-repetition maximum (BP1RM), bench press throw peak velocity against 30 kg (BPT30), and handball throwing velocity. Methods: Thirty-five men were randomly assigned to a traditional group (TRG; n = 12), rest redistribution group (RRG; n = 13), or control group (n = 10). The training program was conducted with the bench press exercise and lasted 6 weeks (2 sessions per week): TRG—6 sets × 5 repetitions with 3 minutes of interset rest; RRG—1 set × 30 repetitions with 31 seconds of interrepetition rest. The total rest period (15 min) and load intensity (75% 1RM) were the same for both experimental groups. Subjects performed all repetitions at maximal intended velocity, and the load was adjusted on a daily basis from velocity recordings. Results: A significant time × group interaction was observed for both BP1RM and BPT30 (P < .01) due to the higher values observed at posttest compared with pretest for TRG (effect size [ES] = 0.77) and RRG (ES = 0.56–0.59) but not for the control group (ES ≤ 0.08). The changes in BP1RM and BPT30 did not differ between TRG and RRG (ES = 0.04 and 0.05, respectively). No significant differences in handball throwing velocity were observed between the pretest and posttest (ES = 0.16, 0.22, and 0.02 for TRG, RRG, and control group, respectively). Conclusions: Resistance-training programs based on not-to-failure traditional and rest redistribution set configurations induce similar changes in BP1RM, BPT30, and handball throwing velocity.
    URI
    http://repositoriodigital.ucsc.cl/handle/25022009/2658
    Ir a texto completo en URI:
    https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-1005
    Collections
    • Artículos Científicos

    UCSC
    UCSC | Contact Us | Send Feedback
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    Login

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    UCSC
    UCSC | Contact Us | Send Feedback